Forensics Source Group is not affiliated to this broker. We do not hold this account, we cannot close a balance, and we do not phone you as this firm.
No — Kuflink is a real business. But the scam reports around it are under active investigation, and if you lost money to someone using its name, that is exactly what we investigate.
Send this to Forensics Source GroupKuflink is a UK P2P property-lending platform (Kuflink Ltd, part of Kuflink Group PLC, FCA ref 724890) — FCA-authorised but currently under an FCA restriction banning it from onboarding new clients. These are the facts that check out on public registers — the complaint record is what our review is still working through:
Checking out is not the same as closed: the complaints against Kuflink are under active investigation, and none of the facts above protects you from a fake. Most 'kuflink scam' searches trace to impersonators, not the platform itself — the ones that don't are the reason we investigate.
One more thing before you deposit: the complaints around Kuflink are under investigation — by us, not by a regulator. This is the highest-risk entry on this list that is still not a scam. Investor allegations (Dec 2025–Jan 2026, multiple reviewers) include: loans to friends and family of staff and shareholders (conflict of interest); lending secured on shares rather than property without disclosure; defaults exceeding 40–50% on some portfolios; retrospective terms changes on existing investments; and recycled long-defaulted loans placed into new investor pools at no discount (as reported by 4thWay). Some investors call it a “Ponzi” — that is their characterisation, not a regulatory finding, and the company strongly refutes fraud; we present both. What is not in dispute: the FCA restriction, the closure of Auto-Invest to new money, weeks-long withdrawals, and long-time investors (10+ years, £50k–£200k) reporting transfers stuck for weeks and only ~15% of matured auto-invest returned after a month. P2P property lending is a high-risk asset class at the best of times — this is a restricted platform inside that class.
Both feel identical from the inside. They are fixed by completely different routes — and the fastest way to tell them apart is to ask three questions.
If it is the real platform: your dispute runs through its formal complaints process, then the regulator or ombudsman. Slow, but it usually works. If you are an existing investor: your route is the firm’s complaints process, then the Financial Ombudsman — the FCA restriction is powerful context for a complaint but not itself compensation. Be extremely wary of anyone offering to “recover” Kuflink money for upfront fees; restricted platforms are recovery-scam magnets.
If it was an impersonator: you were never a customer of Kuflink at all. A clone site, a fake “account manager”, a lookalike domain — the money went to criminals, not to the platform. That is fraud, and speed decides what can be recovered.
The three questions: did you type the official domain yourself, or follow a link, advert or message? Did anyone contact you first? Were you asked to pay a personal account or a different domain? If any answer is wrong, treat it as impersonation — and start here.
No — Kuflink is a real business: FCA authorised (ref 724890) — but with a live restriction: per the FCA register (as reported by a P2P sector forum, Dec 2025), “The Firm must not, without the prior written consent of the FCA, onboard any new clients.” Auto-Invest has been closed to new money since 19 November 2025, and Kuflink stopped covering investor losses with its own funds from 25 September 2025. The scam stories you see online usually trace to fakes borrowing its name — and the ones that don't are part of our active investigation. But read the note above first — the business is real, and so are the caveats.
Yes — FCA authorised, ref 724890 — but with a standing restriction: the firm must not onboard new clients without the FCA’s prior written consent. You can read the restriction on the FCA register. Authorisation plus restriction is a warning state, not a fraud finding.
Almost certainly not. Impersonators borrow the name, the logo, even the licence number. The real company knows nothing about it. Keep every message, receipt, URL and wallet address — that evidence is what an investigation builds on.
The domain you actually used, the date, and whether it was a card, a bank transfer, or crypto. Or the name of the person who told you to pay. Or one screenshot. Where the same payment shows up from other people, those files can sit together as a class action. The first look is free.
Type the official domain yourself — kuflink.com — never follow a link from an advert, email or message. Then check the regulator's public register, which lists the firm's genuine website. If your domain differs by even one character, it was a fake.
Comments are moderated. We only publish comments from verified clients.
Thank you. Your comment has been submitted for moderation and will appear after review.
Forensics Source Group is not affiliated to this broker. We cannot close an account or confirm a balance. Write the date and how you paid.